Order #436 week 4

Discussion, Economics, 1 pages

Great work!! #asalways

Order #482 Week 8: Dialogue

Discussion, Economics, 1 pages

Order #485 2nd paper

1#essay, Any, 5 pages

Always coming through with excellent work!!

Order #511 Dialogue post

Discussion, Management, 1 pages

Order #682 Dialogue post

Discussion, Healthcare, 1 pages

Order #882 Nursing Research Paper

Research Paper, Nursing, 5 pages

Order #936 Comparative Case Study

Comparative Essay, Political-Science, 11.4 pages

Order #1864 Facebook live killings

essay, Any, 4 pages

Order #2405 pick from topic listed

essay, Any, 3 pages

Thank you!

Order #2420 ENGL

essay, English, 2 pages

Thank you for being patient with me. I hope in the future I will not be so complicated. You are great!!!

Order #2624 Chapter 1/2 Discussion

Discussion & 2 responses, Healthcare, 2.5 pages

Thanks for completing my order! The writer has finished my order before the deadline.

Order #2889 Virtual Field Trip Observation

essay, Humanities , 2 pages

Order #2968 Professional Values and Ethics in Social Work

essay, Humanities , 3 pages

Thank You

Order #3121 EKG

essay, Other, 3 pages

Order #3259 Final project

essay, Any, 3 pages

Order #3698 Taken Hostage: The Iran Hostage Crisis and America\\\\\\\'s First Encounter with Radical Islam

Analysis, History, 3.4 pages

Great job and that was really fast on getting the paper done. I appreciate it.

Order #4397 Data Breach

Analysis, Computers, 4 pages

Order #4508 Personal Statement for Master\\\'s program

Admission Essay, Other, 1 pages

Great writer and statement!! Thank you so much!!

Order #4627 Information Security Management Models

Assignment, Other, 6 pages

Information Security Management Models - Rubric collapse Company Description assessment Company Description 12 / 12 Criteria Description To include mission statement, web applications, servers, departments, routers and switches, remote access, wireless communication, firewalls, and demilitarized zone. 5. Target 12 points The student comprehensively describes the company, including all the assignment criteria; information and explanations are accurate and appropriate. Extensive details are provided. 4. Acceptable 10.44 points The student provides a detailed description of the company, including most of the assignment criteria; explanations are accurate. Several supporting details and examples are provided. 3. Approaching 9.48 points The student appropriately describes the company, including more than half of the assignment criteria; some explanations are included. Some supporting details are provided. 2. Insufficient 8.88 points The student outlines a few components of the company, but details are lacking. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The student does not adequately address the criteria and/or it is missing. Criteria Comments No comments. collapse Current Information Security Risks/Threats assessment Current Information Security Risks/Threats 15.66 / 18 Criteria Description Current Information Security Risks/Threats 5. Target 18 points The student comprehensively describes the current risks or threats to the company\'s information security; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. Extensive details and examples are provided. 4. Acceptable 15.66 points The student provides a detailed description of the current risks or threats to the company\'s information security; justifications are accurate. Several supporting details and examples are provided. 3. Approaching 14.22 points The student appropriately describes the current risks or threats to the company\'s information security; some justifications are included. Some supporting details are provided are provided. 2. Insufficient 13.32 points The student outlines a few components of the current risks or threats to the company\'s information security, but details are lacking. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The student does not adequately address the criteria and/or it is missing. Criteria Comments Cite sources for arguments and statements that are not common knowledge collapse Develop System Specific Plans for The Protection of Intellectual Property assessment Develop System Specific Plans for The Protection of Intellectual Property 20.88 / 24 Criteria Description Develop System Specific Plans for The Protection of Intellectual Property 5. Target 24 points The student comprehensively develops system specific plans for the protection of intellectual property from the identified risks or threats; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. The student comprehensively examines the critical security activities that can be tailored to the organization\'s unique needs, with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. 4. Acceptable 20.88 points The student provides a detailed system specific plans for the protection of intellectual property from the identified risks or threats; justifications are accurate. The student clearly addresses the critical security activities that can be tailored to the organization\'s unique needs, with several supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge is appropriate. 3. Approaching 18.96 points The student appropriately describes some system specific plans for the protection of intellectual property from the identified risks or threats; some element justifications are included. The student briefly addresses how the critical security activities can be tailored to the organization\'s unique needs. Some supporting details are provided. Subject knowledge is present. 2. Insufficient 17.76 points The student outlines a few components of system specific plans for the protection of intellectual property from the identified risks or threats, but elements are lacking. The student includes little knowledge about how the critical security activities can be tailored to the organization\'s unique needs. Few details or examples are provided. Little subject knowledge is evident. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The student does not adequately address the criteria and/or it is missing. Criteria Comments The work is unsupported. You must cite sources to support arguments and positions. collapse Security Model/Access Control Mechanisms assessment Security Model/Access Control Mechanisms 15.66 / 18 Criteria Description Security Model/Access Control Mechanisms 5. Target 18 points The student comprehensively describes how the selected security model can protect the organization from being compromised by unauthorized users, as well as determine the applicable access control mechanisms; information and justifications are accurate and appropriate. Extensive details are provided. 4. Acceptable 15.66 points The student provides a detailed description of how the selected security model can protect the organization from being compromised by unauthorized users, as well as determine the applicable access control mechanisms; justifications are accurate. Several supporting details and examples are provided. 3. Approaching 14.22 points The student briefly describes how the selected security model can protect the organization from being compromised by unauthorized users, as well as determine the applicable access control mechanisms; some justifications are included. Some supporting details are provided are provided. 2. Insufficient 13.32 points The student outlines a few components for how the selected security model can protect the organization from being compromised by unauthorized users, as well as determine the applicable access control mechanisms, but details are lacking. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The student does not adequately address the criteria and/or it is missing. Criteria Comments The work is unsupported. You must cite sources to support arguments and positions. collapse Outline and Explain the Roles of Personnel in Planning and Managing Security assessment Outline and Explain the Roles of Personnel in Planning and Managing Security 20.88 / 24 Criteria Description To include Board of Directors, Senior Management, Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), IT Management (CIO, IT Director, etc.), Functional Area Management, Information Security personnel and End users. 5. Target 24 points The student comprehensively outlines and explains each role of the personnel (within the assignment criteria) in planning and managing the security needs identified. Information and explanations are accurate and appropriate. Extensive details are provided. 4. Acceptable 20.88 points The student provides a detailed outline and explanation of the roles of personnel (within the assignment criteria) ) in planning and managing the security needs identified; explanations are accurate. Several supporting details and examples are provided. 3. Approaching 18.96 points The student briefly describes the roles of personnel (within the assignment criteria) in planning and managing the security needs identified; some explanations are included. Some supporting details are provided. 2. Insufficient 17.76 points The student outlines a few of the roles of personnel in planning and managing the security needs identified, but some roles and details are lacking. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The student does not adequately address the criteria and/or it is missing. Criteria Comments The work is unsupported. You must cite sources to support arguments and positions. collapse Sources assessment Sources 0 / 12 Criteria Description Includes use of appropriate style, correct citation format in-text and in reference section. 5. Target 12 points Sources are academic, comprehensive, current, and/or relevant. Quoted material and paraphrasing expertly support, extend, and inform ideas, but do not substitute for the writer\'s own idea development. Sources are well-synthesized to support major points. 4. Acceptable 10.44 points Sources are academic, current, and/or relevant to support major points. Quoted material and paraphrasing are used effectively and consistently to support the major points and writer\'s idea development. 3. Approaching 9.48 points Sources are adequate, relevant, and extend beyond assigned readings. Quoted material and paraphrasing are included to support major points and writer\'s idea development. 2. Insufficient 8.88 points Sources are used to support major points. Important relevant sources are neglected. Quoted material and paraphrasing are overused or mostly missing. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points No outside academic sources are used to support major points. Criteria Comments There was no support used in the work. References cannot be listed unless they are used in the body of the work. collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment Mechanics of Writing 12 / 12 Criteria Description Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. 5. Target 12 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. 4. Acceptable 10.44 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 3. Approaching 9.48 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 2. Insufficient 8.88 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. Criteria Comments No comments. Instructor Comments Comment from instructor: Thank you for submitting the Information Security Management Models assignment where you included a basic description of the selected company to include the mission statement, web applications, servers, departments, routers and switches, remote access, wireless communication, firewalls, and demilitarized zone (DMZ). The description presented met the requirements. You successfully prepared a report for upper management that incorporates the critical security activities in the four steps identified. Finally, your explanation of the seven personnel roles in the planning and managing of the proposed security activities was right on point. The work is unsupported. You must cite sources to support arguments and positions. References were listed but not used. Please let me know if I may answer any questions for you.

Order #4635 Strategic Planning and Policies

PowerPoint w/Speaker notes. (S, Computers, 8 pages

Order #4750 Assignment 4- A Biopsychosocial Approach to Counselling

Assignment, Counseling, 13 pages

Great work, the requirement was 12 pages, and including the title and references made up to 14 pages, as it\'s exceeding more than that, I would have to remove some of the work to bring it to 14 pages. But overall it\'s good work.

Order #5089 Essay 2

essay, Education, 2.2 pages

I would grade a 1/5, but that would be because i had high expectations of using this site. Now im worried about my next papers that i got from here that hasn\'t been graded yet. I got a 70 on this assignment.

Order #5180 Benchmark - Business Continuity Plan (BCP) – Phase 1

Business Plan, Computers, 9 pages

Thank you so much!

Order #5190 Advertising Essay

essay, Other, 4 pages

Order #5216 Differentiated Essential Competencies 2021 highlighted

Reflection , Nursing, 1 pages

Order #5226 Pressure Ulcer Assessment

Case Study, Nursing, 1.8 pages

Order #5239 reflection on Accessing the general education curriculum: Students with disabilities

essay, Education, 1.2 pages

Order #5330 INCUDE assignment

Assignment, Education, 1.2 pages

Order #5416 Womens Suffrage movement

Assignment, History, 2 pages

Order #5417 Position Paper

essay, Education, 3 pages

Order #5610 Becoming Readers and Writers

essay, Education, 3 pages

Order #5649 Sexually transmitted disease

essay, Nursing, 0 pages

Order #6048 Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement

Assignment, Nursing, 2 pages

Order #6201 Proposal Outlines and Problem Statements and Research and Reference List Entries

Discussion post & 1 Response, Sociology, 1.8 pages

great job !!! pretty glad with this writer

Order #6579 Genogram

essay, Any, 4 pages

Order #6842 Weekly Journal

Journal, Other, 3.2 pages

Order #6981 1.3 Disaster Code of Ethics

essay, Ethics, 2 pages

Order #6992 2.2 MSEHPA-Assignment

Compare and Contrast Essay, Ethics, 2 pages